For more information about each award see Awards & Accolades – No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.
A Leading False Claims Act Whistleblower Law Firm Helping People Nationwide
Led by a Former FBI Special Agent
Brown, LLC has recovered millions of dollars for clients who were the victims of False Claims Act.
Past results don’t guarantee future success
Speak with our False Claims Act Whistleblower Lawyers for a Free Consultation – No Charge Unless We Win Your Case
What Is the Federal False Claims Act?
The federal False Claims Act (FCA) is one of the federal government’s strongest tools to fight fraud. A whistleblower whose claim leads to recovery by the government will receive a reward of 15% to 30% of the proceeds collected. Since the False Claims Act allows the government to collect triple damages and penalties, whistleblower rewards can be substantial. It’s critical to note that the False Claims Act applies to conduct outside the U.S. as long as there’s federal spending. The Act also allows anyone to come forward as a whistleblower, including non-U.S. citizens and foreign residents.
What are the elements of a Federal FCA claim?
An FCA whistleblower must allege that false or fraudulent claims were knowingly submitted to a federal program, and that those claims caused the federal government to suffer a significant loss by paying out money that it shouldn’t have paid. Such false claims can take several forms:
- • Overcharging the government for services or products
- •Providing substandard services or products
- • Avoiding an obligation to pay the government or underpaying the government
- • Refusing to return an overpayment from the government
What are the key features of the Federal False Claims Act?
A whistleblower (or “qui tam”) complaint must rely on non-public information, or on public information of which the whistleblower is the original source.
The first person who blows the whistle about a particular fraud is usually the only one whose case will be allowed to proceed, so it’s important to act early.
A whistleblower case must be filed no more than six years after the false claims were submitted, or no more than three years after the government was first informed.
Tax-fraud claims cannot be brought under the federal False Claims Act. However, the IRS whistleblower program might be available to a whistleblower with knowledge of federal tax fraud.
Even a whistleblower who participated in the fraud can still file a case under the federal False Claims Act, so long as they weren’t criminally convicted for the misconduct (note, however, that high-level involvement in the fraud usually results in a lower reward – or perhaps no reward at all).
The False Claims Act forbids retaliation against whistleblowers, providing double damages and other remedies to those who are fired or suffer other retaliation for blowing the whistle.
State and Local False Claims Acts
Many states and a few localities have their own False Claims Acts, allowing whistleblowers with valuable information that a state or local government has been defrauded to bring a qui tam lawsuit under those laws. Most of these acts have been modeled after the federal FCA, with similar elements and structures.
While certain state FCAs cover only Medicaid fraud, others broadly sweep in all sorts of fraud on state and local governments. Numerous successful lawsuits have been brought under state and local FCAs against large-scale telecommunication firms, financial firms, construction companies, charter schools, pharma companies, and others.
The states and localities listed below have False Claims Acts with qui tam provisions. Note that Arkansas and Missouri’s FCAs don’t have qui tam provision, but provide for rewards to tipsters in certain circumstances, and Alaska’s Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act has no qui tam provision or tipster rewards.
The following are general descriptions of the state laws. The descriptions were correct when written and posted but may be out of date when you read them. You may not rely on any information on this page and should consult with whistleblower attorneys before making any decisions about what you read online. The whistleblower law firm of Brown, LLC offers free, confidential consultations to whistleblowers under the False Claims Act and other laws used to report fraud by calling (877) 561-0000.
The Alaska Medical Assistance False Claim and Reporting Act authorizes lawsuits only by the state’s attorney general and makes no provision for awards to tipsters.
The False Claims Acts of Arkansas and Missouri apply just to fraud upon the Medicaid programs of those states. These laws don’t include qui tam provisions – that is, they don’t authorize private individuals to bring suit. However, tipsters can receive up to 10% of any sums the government recovers.
The California False Claims Act broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision. Claims for tax fraud and fraud upon the state’s employees’ compensation fund are excluded. The Act has a six-year statute of limitations, which may be extended in certain cases.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 33% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 50% if the state declines to intervene. The law protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
California also allows whistleblowers to file qui tam actions for fraud upon private insurers, not just Medicare or Medicaid, under the California Insurance Fraud Prevention Act. Harm to the government need not be shown. A successful whistleblower can receive between 30% and 40% of all subsequent recoveries in cases where the state Department of Insurance intervenes, and between 40% and 50% if the Department declines to intervene. Even in a case where the whistleblower relies primarily on public information, he can still receive an award of up to 10% of the recovery.
A case under the California IFPA must be filed no more than three years after the discovery of the facts underlying the action. The IFPA also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The Colorado Medicaid False Claims Act permits qui tam lawsuits only for fraud upon the Colorado Medicaid program. The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
Connecticut permits qui tam lawsuits only for fraud upon the Connecticut Medicaid program. The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The Delaware False Claims and Reporting Act broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision. Claims for tax fraud are excluded. The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The District of Columbia FCA broadly covers fraud upon the district government. The DC FCA also allows qui tam suits to blow the whistle on tax fraud, where the fraudster’s income exceeds $1 million, and the tax owed exceeds $350,000. The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The Florida FCA broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision. Claims for tax fraud are excluded. A complaint must generally be filed within six years of the date on which the violation occurred (extended to within ten years in certain circumstances).
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The Taxpayer Protection False Claims Act broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision (excluding tax fraud). The state also has a separate Medicaid False Claims Act. Both laws have ten-year statutes of limitation.
Under both laws, a successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 33% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The laws also protect those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The Guam False Claims and Whistleblower Act broadly covers fraud on Guamanian government programs. The Act also rewards whistleblowers who report tax fraud. The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the government intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. A tax-fraud whistleblower can receive 15% to 30% of recuperated funds where the Director of Revenue and Taxation intervenes, and not less than 30% if the department declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
Hawaii has two False Claims Acts, one that covers claims to the state and another that covers claims to the counties. Both acts have qui tam provisions. The laws have general application, covering many types of fraud, not just Medicaid fraud. Both laws have ten-year statutes of limitation.
Under both laws, a successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the government intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The laws also protect those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
Illinois has an FCA that broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision. The Act also rewards whistleblowers who report tax fraud. The law has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
Illinois law allows whistleblowers to file qui tam actions for fraud upon private insurers, not just Medicare or Medicaid, under the Illinois Insurance Claims Fraud Prevention Act. Harm to the government need not be shown. A successful whistleblower can receive at least 30% of subsequent recoveries in cases where the state Department of Insurance intervenes, and at least 40% if the Department declines to intervene.
A case under the Illinois ICFPA must be filed no more than three years after the discovery of the facts underlying the action. The IFPA also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
City of Chicago
In addition to these state laws, the City of Chicago has its own False Claims Act, under which whistleblowers can sue on behalf of the City of Chicago if they have information related to fraud, waste, or abuse upon the local government. A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the city intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the city declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
Illinois has an FCA that broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision. The Act also rewards whistleblowers who report tax fraud. The law has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
Illinois law allows whistleblowers to file qui tam actions for fraud upon private insurers, not just Medicare or Medicaid, under the Illinois Insurance Claims Fraud Prevention Act. Harm to the government need not be shown. A successful whistleblower can receive at least 30% of subsequent recoveries in cases where the state Department of Insurance intervenes, and at least 40% if the Department declines to intervene.
A case under the Illinois ICFPA must be filed no more than three years after the discovery of the facts underlying the action. The IFPA also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle
Iowa has an FCA that broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision (excluding tax fraud). The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The Louisiana Medical Assistance Programs Integrity Law applies just to false claims submitted to the state’s Medicaid program. The law has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 35% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
Maryland has an FCA that broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision (excluding tax fraud), and a separate Medicaid False Claims Act. Both laws have ten-year statutes of limitation.
Under both laws, a successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes; however, if the state declines to intervene the lawsuit will be dismissed (that is, a whistleblower is not allowed to proceed on her own). The laws also protect those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
Massachusetts has an FCA that broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision (excluding tax fraud). The law has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The Michigan Medicaid False Claims Act applies just to false claims submitted to the state’s Medicaid program. The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The Minnesota FCA broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision (excluding tax fraud). The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene (and if the state does not initially intervene, but subsequently joins the case midstream, the award will range between 15% and 30% if the case is successful). The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The Montana FCA broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision (excluding tax fraud). The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The Nevada FCA broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision (excluding tax fraud). The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The New Hampshire FCA applies just to false claims submitted to the state’s Medicaid program. The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The New Jersey FCA broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision (excluding tax fraud). The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
New Mexico has an FCA that broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision (excluding tax fraud), and a separate Medicaid False Claims Act. Both laws have four-year statutes of limitation.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The laws also protect those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The New York FCA broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision. The NY FCA also allows qui tam suits to blow the whistle on tax fraud, where the fraudster’s income exceeds $1 million, and the tax owed exceeds $350,000. The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The laws also protect those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle
New York City
New York City has its own False Claims Act, which allows qui tam lawsuits by whistleblowers who are aware of fraudulent claims submitted to the city. The Act is limited to claims with a cumulative value of at least $25,000 and excludes tax-fraud claims. The Act has a six-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the city intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the city declines to intervene. The laws also protect those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The North Carolina FCA broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision (excluding tax fraud). The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The Oklahoma FCA applies just to false claims submitted to the state’s Medicaid program. The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The Puerto Rico FCA broadly covers fraud upon the Commonwealth government or any political subdivision (excluding tax fraud). The Act has a six-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The Rhode Island FCA broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision (excluding tax fraud). The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
Tennessee has an FCA that broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision (excluding tax fraud), and a separate Medicaid False Claims Act. Both laws have ten-year statutes of limitation.
Under the Tennessee FCA, a successful whistleblower can receive between 25% and 33% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 33% and 50% if the state declines to intervene. Under the Medicaid False Claims Act, whistleblower awards are limited to between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. Both laws also protect those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act applies just to false claims submitted to the state’s Medicaid program. The Act has a six-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
Texas has a separate law that allows for an award for reporting fraud, waste or overcharging in the state Medicaid program, if the reported information results in the recovery of an administrative penalty. The award may not exceed five percent of the amount of that administrative penalty.
The Vermont FCA broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision (excluding tax fraud). The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The Virgin Islands has an FCA that broadly covers fraud upon the territory or any political subdivision (excluding tax fraud).
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the government intervenes, and between 33% and 50% if the government declines to intervene.
Present or former government employees generally cannot bring lawsuits that depend on information obtained over the span of their service term.
The Virginia FCA broadly covers fraud upon the state or any political subdivision (excluding tax fraud). The Act has a ten-year statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle.
The Washington FCA applies just to false claims submitted to the state’s Medicaid program. Notably, the Act has no statute of limitations.
A successful whistleblower can receive between 15% and 25% of the recovered proceeds in cases where the state intervenes, and between 25% and 30% if the state declines to intervene. The law also protects those who suffer employment retaliation for blowing the whistle; retaliation claims must be brought no more than three years after the retaliation occurs.
Consult With Our False Claims Act Attorney
The False Claims Act attorneys at Brown, LLC have significant experience representing whistleblowers exposing fraud upon government programs in states across the country. To schedule a confidential consultation or to read more information call us at (877) 561-0000
Free Confidential Consultation
Fill out the form below and our team will reach out to you.
Blog
Holding Banks and other Lending Institutions accountable for PPP Fraud
May 16, 2022
No Comments
Any leading whistleblower law firm tackling the tens of billions of dollars stolen from the
False Claims Act: Mergers and Acquisitions as Kickbacks in Healthcare
April 28, 2022
No Comments
FThe Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b) (the “AKS”), prohibits the payment of kickbacks in any
The False Claim Act: How It Works for Whistleblowers
March 23, 2022
No Comments
The False Claim Act, also referred to as the “Lincoln Law,” is a very well-known
Small Business Administration(SBA) Identifies $80 Billion in Potential Pandemic Fraud
March 18, 2022
No Comments
The Small Business Administration (“SBA”) recently announced that it has identified over $80 billion in
Will Speaking to an attorney about suspected Medicare fraud violate HIPAA?
March 14, 2022
No Comments
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, commonly known as HIPAA, is intended to protect
Administration Announces Pandemic Fraud Chief
March 7, 2022
No Comments
Now more than ever, it’s important to promptly report PPP Loan Fraud, and other COVID

Holding Banks and other Lending Institutions accountable for PPP Fraud
Blog False Claims Act Qui Tam Blog Whistleblower Whistleblower FAQ

False Claims Act: Mergers and Acquisitions as Kickbacks in Healthcare
Blog False Claims Act Qui Tam Blog Whistleblower Whistleblower FAQ

The False Claim Act: How It Works for Whistleblowers
Blog False Claims Act Qui Tam Blog Whistleblower Whistleblower FAQ

Small Business Administration(SBA) Identifies $80 Billion in Potential Pandemic Fraud
Blog False Claims Act Qui Tam Blog Whistleblower Whistleblower FAQ

Will Speaking to an attorney about suspected Medicare fraud violate HIPAA?
Blog False Claims Act Qui Tam Blog Whistleblower Whistleblower FAQ

Administration Announces Pandemic Fraud Chief
Blog False Claims Act Qui Tam Blog Whistleblower Whistleblower FAQ
Our Achievements
100 Million Dollar Settlement Fund for Women Injured by a New Birth Control Product
Jason T. Brown was the first attorney in the country to file a battery of cases on behalf of women who sustained blood clots, such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolisms, strokes and death from a new Birth control Product. Jason T. Brown’s prior firm was on the PSC (Plaintiff Steering Committee) and served as liaison counsel in the state mass tort action. The firm is no longer accepting new cases.
Tens of Millions in Settlements for Mass Tort Injuries and Class Actions

$7 Million Plus Settlement for Consumer Fraud

$7 Million Dollar Commercial Litigation Settlement

$5.475+ Million Settlement for Temple Online Students
Value of the settlement when factoring in non-economic relief exceeds $7 million dollars. Description and Settlement forms available at:
www.templeombasettlement.com
www.templeotherfoxprogramssettlement.com

Millions in Settlements for Women Injured by New Generation Hormonal Product
Women who sustained blood clots from a new Generation Hormonal Product received and continue to receive compensation for their injuries. Compensable injuries include Pulmonary Embolisms (PE), Deep-Vein Thrombosis (DVT), Strokes and Death. The firm is still investigating and accepting cases.

Nationwide $3.5 Million Settlement for Wage & Hour Class Action Case
Case brought on behalf of at home call center workers who were not paid for all their time worked including boot up time, technical time and other time. Workers were told by the company that boot up time which lasted 15 minutes or more was not paid because it was considered their commute to work. Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

$3.2 Million Settlement for Wage & Hour Class Action Case
Case brought on behalf of workers who were misclassified as salaried exempt from overtime. The employer led employees to believe that they had to work unlimited hours over 40 without overtime compensation even though based on their job duties it was alleged they were entitled to overtime pay.

$2.4 Million Dollar Settlement for Wage & Hour Class Action
Lawsuit was brought as a class action on behalf of workers who worked in excess of 40 hours a week and were not paid overtime. The employer was forcing them to work “off the clock” for those hours and failed to pay proper overtime compensation.

$2 Million Dollar Settlement for False Claims Act (Whistleblower Case)

“$2 Million Dollar False Claims Act (FCA) Settlement – Unnecessary Services”
A case against GenomeDx was brought alleging violations of the False Claims Act (FCA) and the California Insurance Claims Fraud Prevention Act regarding unnecessary services such as the testing of tissues that did not need to be tested. The case resulted in a $350,000 whistleblower award.

$2 Million Dollar Settlement for Truck Accident Victim
Our firm was Of Counsel to a serious truck accident case involving a trucking accident with multiple injuries.

Nationwide $1.3 Million Judgment against Future Income Payments and Scott Kohn for Consumer Fraud
Scott Kohn and Future Income Payments conspired to defraud veterans out of their hard earned pensions by offering them loans at loanshark rates and claiming it was a “purchase” not a loan.

$1.7 Million Dollar Settlement for Wage & Hour Case
Misclassified employees under the FLSA were not paid overtime for hours worked in excess of 40. Due to a confidentiality agreement specific details are intentionally omitted.

Judgment with Maximum Damages for Employment Litigation
Judgment for misclassification under the FLSA including maximum damages under State and Federal Laws, plus an incentive fee for the lead plaintiff with attorney fees paid separately. The case involved a worker who was paid a day rate regardless of the amount of hours worked per day and per week.

Class Action Jury Trial
Workers alleged that they were misclassified according to their job duties. The Defendant claimed an administrative exemption under the FLSA and state law. Misclassification cases under the FLSA are the cases most often tried due to non-monetary considerations. Jury Trial lasted three weeks. Settlement offered in lieu of appeal.

Acquittal at Trial
Despite videotaped evidence that the prosecutor alleged incriminated the defendant, Mr. Brown was able to obtain an acquittal at trial for his client. Please note, that while we, the Brown, LLC will provide consultations in defense matters, the firm spends most of its time litigating complex litigation such as class actions, mass torts and catastrophic injuries.

Judgment with Maximum Damages for Wage & Hour Dispute
Wage & Hour dispute on behalf of hourly employees who were not paid time and a half for hours in excess of 40. Employees were granted double damages for all their time with attorney fees and costs paid separately.

Million Dollar Settlement for Wage & Hour Class Action Case
Workers were compelled to come into work 15 minutes early to set up, but were not paid for their set up time. Gap issues aside, workers received double damages for the time worked for 3 years’ worth of pay with attorney fees paid separately.
This is a non-exhaustive list of prior results and successes of Jason T. Brown and the Brown, LLC. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

For more information about each award see Awards & Accolades – All cases involve Jason T. Brown and/ or Brown, LLC
No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
REQUEST A CONSULTATION
How Can We Help? If It’s Not Right We’ll Fight Tell Us About Your Case.