Surgery Robot Raises FDA Safety Concerns
The robotic surgery assistant called da Vinci may be the most cutting edge tool in surgery–but is da Vinci safe?
The many-armed da Vinci is a million dollar robot, and is a standard part of many hospital operating rooms. The surgery robot was used in nearly 400,000 surgeries in 2012, a figure which tripled its surgery participation over the previous year.
This surge in popularity of the use of the pricey robot system has coincided with reports of problems ranging from minor injuries and surgical mistakes to serious injury and even death.
Popularity and Safety
Is the use of a robot for surgery actually safe, or has the heavy marketing behind the robot caused the surge in its popularity? Some doctors feel that there is a lack of research to prove that da Vinci provides equal skill and safety as a conventional surgery.
US Hospitals heavily advertise their robotic surgery services and proudly announce their use of da Vinci in brochures and billboards, hoping to attract more business that will essentially pay for its cost. Using the da Vinci for operations on prostates, heart valves, gallbladders, stomachs and more, surgeons all over the world have had success. However, da Vinci remains the most popular in the US.
Because surgeons sit at a computer while controlling da Vinci, the surgeries are less tiring for them. Another benefit of da Vinci is that robotic hands don’t shake as human hands can. These benefits aside, the robot has come under more recent scrutiny from the FDA in the past year due to the spike in reported problems.
The FDA Invetigates da Vinci
Reports about injuries caused to patients at the robotic hands of da Vinci included 5 deaths in 2012.
It is important to note that doctors are not required to report such things directly to the FDA–that responsibility rests in the hands of the hospitals and the device makers themselves.
The spike in reports of harm could be related to the wider usage of da Vinci. In 2012 there were 367,000 robot-assisted surgeries while there were only 114,000 in 2008.
da Vinci is manufactured by Intuitive Surgical Inc. of Sunnyvale, CA, and it i their only product. The robot is also the only one approved by the FDA for use during soft tissue surgery.
Reports filed in 2012 included a woman who died durying a hysterectomy in which da Vinci accidentally severed a blood vessel and a New York man whose colon wa ut during a prostate surgery.
The FDA is currently trying to determine whether complications and injuries are actually more common in robotic operations than in traditional surgeries. Because surgery is inherently risky, it is a difficult task to conquer. Robotic surgery has been rapidly adopted and studies about its safety have yet to catch up with its growth in popularity.
“The rapid adoption of robotic surgery has been done by and large without the proper evaluation,” said Dr. martin Makary of Johns Hopkins who coauthored an upcoming research paper that focuses on the underreporting of problems linked with robotic surgery. Markary’s forthcoming paper notes that the complications of robot-assisted surgery can be “catastrophic.”
The FDA is concerned about the widespread use without proper investigation into patient safety. The da Vinci system is used in about 1,400 U.S. hospital, which is nearly 25% of all hospitals in the country. The robots cost nearly $1.5 million. A 2011 study found that hospitals tended to aggressively promote their use of robotic surgery and sometimes exaggerate the claims. They often used wording from da Vinci’s manufacturer to back up their claims.
Benefits and Drawbacks
There are some benefits to the use of da Vinci in surgery, especially in situations requiring operation in extremely small or hard-to-reach areas such as head and neck cancer surgery and certain rectal surgeries. The robotic assistant can also be very helpful for weight-loss surgeries on very obese patients whose size can make traditional surgery very challenging.
While da Vinci is a robot, its efficacy rests at the hands (literally) of actual surgeons in the room, who must be skillful in its operation.. There are questions about exactly how much training and experience surgeons need with da Vinci before they can be considered fully trained.
A 2007 lawsuit against da Vinci’s manufacturer cited inadequate surgeon training with the robot. Another malpractice cases ended in 2012 with a $7.5 million jury award for the family of a man who died after robotic spleen surgery in 2007.
While da Vinci’s manufacturer, Intuitive Surgical, does train surgeons in the robot’s use, they do not train for operation-specific procedures. That responsibility is left to the hospitals and surgeons who must decide when it is prudent to use da Vinci, and whether or not a surgeon is ready to do so.
FThe Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b) (the “AKS”), prohibits the payment of kickbacks in any
The False Claim Act, also referred to as the “Lincoln Law,” is a very well-known
The Small Business Administration (“SBA”) recently announced that it has identified over $80 billion in
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, commonly known as HIPAA, is intended to protect
In 2021, the SEC Whistleblower Program awarded over $560 million to whistleblowers who provided insider
100 Million Dollar Settlement Fund for Women Injured by a New Birth Control Product
Jason T. Brown was the first attorney in the country to file a battery of cases on behalf of women who sustained blood clots, such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolisms, strokes and death from a new Birth control Product. Jason T. Brown’s prior firm was on the PSC (Plaintiff Steering Committee) and served as liaison counsel in the state mass tort action. The firm is no longer accepting new cases.
Tens of Millions in Settlements for Mass Tort Injuries and Class Actions
$7 Million Plus Settlement for Consumer Fraud
$7 Million Dollar Commercial Litigation Settlement
Millions in Settlements for Women Injured by New Generation Hormonal Product
Women who sustained blood clots from a new Generation Hormonal Product received and continue to receive compensation for their injuries. Compensable injuries include Pulmonary Embolisms (PE), Deep-Vein Thrombosis (DVT), Strokes and Death. The firm is still investigating and accepting cases.
Nationwide $3.5 Million Settlement for Wage & Hour Class Action Case
Case brought on behalf of at home call center workers who were not paid for all their time worked including boot up time, technical time and other time. Workers were told by the company that boot up time which lasted 15 minutes or more was not paid because it was considered their commute to work. Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
$3.2 Million Settlement for Wage & Hour Class Action Case
Case brought on behalf of workers who were misclassified as salaried exempt from overtime. The employer led employees to believe that they had to work unlimited hours over 40 without overtime compensation even though based on their job duties it was alleged they were entitled to overtime pay.
$2.4 Million Dollar Settlement for Wage & Hour Class Action
Lawsuit was brought as a class action on behalf of workers who worked in excess of 40 hours a week and were not paid overtime. The employer was forcing them to work “off the clock” for those hours and failed to pay proper overtime compensation.
$2 Million Dollar Settlement for False Claims Act (Whistleblower Case)
“$2 Million Dollar False Claims Act (FCA) Settlement – Unnecessary Services”
A case against GenomeDx was brought alleging violations of the False Claims Act (FCA) and the California Insurance Claims Fraud Prevention Act regarding unnecessary services such as the testing of tissues that did not need to be tested. The case resulted in a $350,000 whistleblower award.
$2 Million Dollar Settlement for Truck Accident Victim
Our firm was Of Counsel to a serious truck accident case involving a trucking accident with multiple injuries.
Nationwide $1.3 Million Judgment against Future Income Payments and Scott Kohn for Consumer Fraud
Scott Kohn and Future Income Payments conspired to defraud veterans out of their hard earned pensions by offering them loans at loanshark rates and claiming it was a “purchase” not a loan.
$1.7 Million Dollar Settlement for Wage & Hour Case
Misclassified employees under the FLSA were not paid overtime for hours worked in excess of 40. Due to a confidentiality agreement specific details are intentionally omitted.
Judgment with Maximum Damages for Employment Litigation
Judgment for misclassification under the FLSA including maximum damages under State and Federal Laws, plus an incentive fee for the lead plaintiff with attorney fees paid separately. The case involved a worker who was paid a day rate regardless of the amount of hours worked per day and per week.
Class Action Jury Trial
Workers alleged that they were misclassified according to their job duties. The Defendant claimed an administrative exemption under the FLSA and state law. Misclassification cases under the FLSA are the cases most often tried due to non-monetary considerations. Jury Trial lasted three weeks. Settlement offered in lieu of appeal.
Acquittal at Trial
Despite videotaped evidence that the prosecutor alleged incriminated the defendant, Mr. Brown was able to obtain an acquittal at trial for his client. Please note, that while we, the Brown, LLC will provide consultations in defense matters, the firm spends most of its time litigating complex litigation such as class actions, mass torts and catastrophic injuries.
Judgment with Maximum Damages for Wage & Hour Dispute
Wage & Hour dispute on behalf of hourly employees who were not paid time and a half for hours in excess of 40. Employees were granted double damages for all their time with attorney fees and costs paid separately.
Million Dollar Settlement for Wage & Hour Class Action Case
Workers were compelled to come into work 15 minutes early to set up, but were not paid for their set up time. Gap issues aside, workers received double damages for the time worked for 3 years’ worth of pay with attorney fees paid separately.
This is a non-exhaustive list of prior results and successes of Jason T. Brown and the Brown, LLC. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
For more information about each award see Awards & Accolades – All cases involve Jason T. Brown and/ or Brown, LLC
No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.